Impairment detection: an ethical debate

You must be logged in to watch this session

First Name*

Last Name*

Job Title

Company Name

Country of Residence*

Work E-mail Address*

Password*

Confirm Password*

Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy.

Sense Media, on behalf of AutoSens, needs the contact information you provide to us to update you with information about AutoSens and our products. You may unsubscribe from these communications at anytime. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our privacy policy.

Only fill in if you are not human

Impairment detection: an ethical debate

Event: InCabin Brussels

| Session date: Thursday 22nd June

Session date: Thursday 22nd June

, 2023

Hear from:

Moderator

Sara Sargent

Principal Analyst,

Sense Media Group

Tal Kryzpow

VP Product & Strategy,

Cipia

Samantha Lee

CEO,

Meili Technologies

Fabiano Ruaro

Product Manager for Interior Monitoring Systems,

Bosch

Tal Kryzpow

VP Product & Strategy,

Cipia

Samantha Lee

CEO,

Meili Technologies

Fabiano Ruaro

Product Manager for Interior Monitoring Systems,

Bosch

If we know someone is drunk driving, what is the correct ethical next step? Many respond that we should pull the car over, or don’t let them start the car. The challenge to this idea is what if the technology gets it wrong? What are the true determining measures of drunkenness? Is a BAC over .08 for one person an issue but not for another? And who is liable? If the system says they are not drunk and they are, who is responsible? and alternatively if it says they are drunk and they are not? What if they are driving someone to the hospital, or in a rural area with no one around and then need help?